

CANADA'S
AGE
OF
SEXUAL
CONSENT
RISES
TO
16
-
May
2008
PEDOPHILE STATISTICS
STATEMENT OF THE FORMER WIFE OF A CONVICTED PEDOPHILE -
BRITISH
COLUMBIA
'There was more compassion shown towards the animals exploited for beastiality than there was for the children and their families'
INTERPOL PEDOPHILE ASSASSINATION TEAMS
BRITISH COLUMBIA PEDOPHILE RING
Witness testimony alleges that senior B.C. native chiefs, RCMP officers and senior government officials are involved in this provincial wide pedophile ring and that it is being covered-up by all authorities.
AN MLA WITH 30 YEARS
EXPERIENCE AS A LAWYER AND 11 AS A JUDGE ALLEGES THAT POLICE PROTECT AND
COVER-UP A PEDOPHILE RING
SELECTIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT
Statement of a Canadian Police Officer
MONTREAL
-
A
DESTINATION
OF
CHOICE
FOR
PEDOPHILES
-
AUGUST
2007
WEBSITE
TELLS
TELLS
PEDOPHILES
TO
VISIT
MONTREAL
-
JULY
2007
LINKS
DEFINITION OF PEDOPHILIA
Pedophilia involves
re-occurring sexual arousal and desires or fantasies involving sexual
impulses toward a pre-adolescent child or children.
To be classified as a pedophile, the individual must be above age 16, and
the sexual attraction must involve a child of age 13 or younger who is at
least 5 years younger than the adult.
A pedophile has either acted on these sexual impulses, or the fantasies
and/or sexual arousal and impulses disturb the individual. The pedophile
is sexually aroused because the child is a child, regardless of the
pedophile's sexual orientation, or the child's gender.
BACK TO TOP
INTERPOL PEDOPHILE ASSASSINATION TEAMS
DAVID
BANNON
T
he first print interviews of Jacques Deffere, Dr. Bannon's Interpol
supervisor, Henri Wolper, and Lee Hyung-jin were published January 2004 in the Lake Norman Times. You may enjoy reading this short 1,000-word profile:
LAKE NORMAN
TIMES. Additional information may be found on the web site of author, Jason Putman.
Jason Putman
As stated on the front page of this site, former Canadian Prime Ministers, Pierre Elliot Trudeau and Brian Mulroney have been identified by former CIA operatives as being pedophiles.
When pedophiles are in high positions of power, as at least two former Canadian Prime Ministers are identified as being, it is not difficult to understand why there is such strong opposition from the authorities in responding to child protect issues or otherwise enforcing both Domestic and International Rights of Children in Canada.
BACK TO TOP
PEDOPHILE
STATISTICS
Society mistakenly assumes that child abuse, specifically child sexual abuses, is restricted to the deviant sexual behavior of an individual pedophile. The fact is, there are organized groups of pedophiles that abuse and exploit children on a much larger
scale, including associations with crime syndicates that involve
all forms of child exploitation.
Another standard misconception held by society, is that pedophilia
is restricted to the male population. Although over-all statistical
evidence does identify that the majority of pedophiles are male,
it also confirms that the female pedophilia ratio is in the area
of 1 female to 6 male pedophiles.
According to the Synopsis of Psychiatry, seventh edition, 'the
perpetrator of child abuse is more often the mother than the father.
Sexual abuse is usually men, although women, acting in concert
with men or alone, have also been involved, especially with child
pornography. The incidence of sexual abuse and child pornography
is much higher than was previously assumed'.
Another fallacy, that appears to be a by-product of news media
attention, is that the majority of abuse victims are girls, yet
statistical evidence provided by sex offenders themselves and
documented by the professional community, identifies that 60%
of sexual abuse victims are boys.
Statistical American evidence identifies the fact that the
average pedophile molests between 200 and 300 children. Additionally,
these statistics identify that between 20 and 50 percent of all
children have been victimized by a pedophile or otherwise molested,
by the age of 18.
The Synopsis of Psychiatry, seventh edition, reports that 'only
an estimated 2 to 8 percent of allegations of sexual abuse turn
out to be false. A much higher percentage of reports cannot be
substantiated because many investigations are done hastily or
by inexperienced evaluators'.
BACK TO TOP
LINKS
ENTREPRENEURS
AGAINST PEDOPHILES
CANADIANS ADDRESSING SEXUAL EXPLOITATION (C.A.S.E.)
PEDOWATCH
PEDOPHILES; Mental Health Journal
BACK TO TOP
BRITISH COLUMBIA PEDOPHILE RING
In June of 1998, a UN-sponsored Tribunal into Native Residential School abuse was held in Vancouver, B.C. Evidence presented at the Tribunal identified a pedophile/drug ring operating out of the Prince George-Morricetown area of the province.
Witness testimony alleges the senor B.C. native chiefs, RCMP officers and senior government officials are involved in this provincial wide pedophile ring and that it is being covered-up by all authorities.
The prestigious Vancouver Club was identified as the center of a predominantly homosexual pedophile ring involving two senior Supreme Court judges, RCMP officers, a senior United Church lawyer, two regional Indian Affairs Officers and Law Society Lawyers.
Two attempts to uncover this pedophile ring since 1996 have been smashed, including the disappearance of child survivors and a reporter who was assaulted after interviewing survivors and has not been hear of since.
More information on this pedophile ring can be viewed at Rev.
Kevin Annett's web site
HIDDEN FROM HISTORY: The Canadian Holocaust
The Vancouver Province newspaper was investigating the allegations
but stopped after being threatened with lawsuits from the judges named.
The Radical Press, an independent newspaper and only news source in British Columbia to write about this pedophile ring, reported that the rings protection came from former B.C. Premier Ujjal Dosanjh, the Attorney-Generals office and local RCMP officers.
Concerned about the allegations in relationship to Chief Johns
appointment as Minister for Children and Families, we wrote the following letter to Premier Dosanjh on December 29 2002.
Dear Premier
Dosanjh:
.........writing to ask you for a reasonable explanation as to why you appointed Chief Ed John, a person implicated in a pedophile and drug ring, as British Columbia's Minister for Children and Families on November 01, 2000.
Chief Ed John is one of the senior native politicians in B.C. He is the head of the Treaty Commission and the Carrier-Sekani Tribal Council. He is not however a legitimate MLA. He was not elected by the people of British Columbia and yet you appear to have handed him this sensitive Ministry on a silver platter.
It is a matter of public record the Chief John was implicated in a provincial wide pedophile and drug ring during an independent U.N. sponsored Tribunal held in Vancouver in June of 1998. Chief John refused to appear before the Tribunal even though he was issued a Diplomatic Summons to address the allegations.
Sworn testimony given at the Tribunal stated the Chief John and other native leaders operated a child sex ring out of Morricetown, B.C., and that on occasion ten girls and boys were taken through the back door of the elite Vancouver Club in May and June of 1998 to be sexually exploited.
Members of Ed John's own tribal council have testified that top native politicians in B.C. are linked directly to the Asian drug trade and are using coastal reserves to import drugs. An article printed in the November issue of the Radical has even gone so far as to state that a Carrier-Sekani man has alleged that Chief John uses Department of Indian Affairs money to buy crack and cocaine which he traffics on the northern reserves. According to this article both the United Church and the RCMP know all
about these operations however the RCMP look the other way when the drugs are brought in through Port Renfrew, Port Albany and other ports.
Were these allegations against Chief John competently investigated and was he exonerated of all implicated involvement in criminal activities prior to his appointment as the Minister for Children and Families?
Given that the RCMP and United Church are implicated as being involved in these operations which third party police force or domestic intelligence agency investigated?
It is obvious that any investigation that may have been conducted by the RCMP would not only be a conflict of interest, it would do little if anything to resolve these extremely serious allegations.
For several years there have been serious concerns, unrelated to Chief John, that some select personnel within the Ministry for Children and Families and members of the RCMP are directly involved with child pornography and prostitution operations and/or the cover-up of these operations.
Regardless of the guilt or innocence of Chief John, it is definitely
not in the best interest of the children, or people of British Columbia for that matter, to appoint him Minister for Children and Families, particularly with the allegations against him and especially when the Ministry is already implicated as being one of the primary controlling factors involved with child pornography and prostitution operations in British Columbia.
Sincerely,
R.W. Nicholson
In response to Premier Dosanjh's reply the following letter was sent to him on February 22, 2001.
Dear Premier
Dosanjh:
......acknowledge you letter of January 29, in response to our query regarding the curious appointment of and extremely serious
allegations against Chief Ed John. Your letter failed to address the questions of why Ed John was appointed Minister for Children and Families on November 01, 2000. Ed John is not a legitimate MLA. He was not elected by the people of British Columbia and yet you appear to have handed him this sensitive Ministry on a silver platter. Not only does Ed John's most curious appointment to such a sensitive Ministry provide an air of dictatorial egotism, it blatantly disregards Democratic Rights and Freedoms by withholding elected representation from the people of British Columbia.
In your response you wrote that the issue has been forwarded to the Ministry of Attorney General for investigation and possible defamation proceedings. Your reference to defamation proceedings is interesting at best. The information and evidence implicating Chief Ed John in a provincial wide pedophile and drug smuggling ring was given to an independent U.N. sponsored Tribunal held in Vancouver in June of 1998. Our perception of your reference to defamation proceedings is that you would consider any evidence given under oath, under any circumstances, be it a U.N. Tribunal or Canadian Court of Law, as being defamatory towards the accused. Please clarify this issue as we are under the impression that sworn testimony and evidence is valid in any proceeding regardless of the jurisdiction it was presented. To say otherwise is suggestive of total disrespect and disregard towards the entire judicial process, domestic or international.
The extremely serious allegations against Ed John not only constitute domestic criminal activity, they are crimes against humanity as defined by the United Nations. Any competent investigation must be conducted by the international community not by domestic agencies. There is far to much evidence that either seriously implicates or outright identifies the direct involvement of and cover-up by high ranking members of the RCMP, Ministry for Children and Families personnel and personnel from within the Ministry of Attorney General, in this and other child exploitation cases.
Be advised that we will be contacting international police agencies to inform them of these and related issues and circumstances while also requesting international interventions for what is readily identified as crimes against humanity.
Sincerely,
R.W. Nicholson
Because the RCMP have been identified as participants in this organization, we emailed Interpol and asked if they would intervene and investigate the allegations. To date, we have had no response to our query.
In an unrelated case that identified RCMP and the Ministry for Children and Families involvement in and cover-up of child pornography we requested Interpol intervention.
Their reply in this case identified the fact that Interpol is only mandated to support law enforcement agencies. They do not support public requests to investigate criminal activities perpetrated by law enforcement agencies.
Interpol Response Letter
We emailed Premier Dosanjh requesting an update
on the investigation into the allegations levied against Ed John that he had informed us of. We received the following response to our query.
Response Email From the Attorney Generals Office
Rev. Kevin Annett and a group of dedicated citizens that initially
identified the pedophile ring and brought it to the attention of the public are actively pursuing this case. Case updates and
related material can be viewed at HIDDEN FROM HISTORY: The Canadian Holocaust
BACK TO TOP
SELECTIVE LAW
ENFORCEMENT
"Selective law enforcement, in addition to the obvious types of cover-up, is not uncommon and is most effective in reducing the effectiveness of child protection."
Statement of a Canadian Police Officer 2005
BACK TO TOP
STATEMENT OF THE FORMER WIFE OF A
CONVICTED PEDOPHILE



Back
To
Top