REPRESENTATIVE CASES

 British Columbia Provincial Court Judge - Brian Saunderson

In 1996, Veron Logan was charger with, and pleaded guilty to, possession of child pronography.  B.C. Provincial Court Judge, Brian Saunderson, granted Logan an absolute discharge.  Logan was granted an absolute discharge because, in Saunderson's opinion, the law violated the Charter of Rights.

Federal Court Justice - Barbara Reed

In 1990, Henry Halm fled to Canada after being convicted in New York State on five counts of sodomy and three counts of endangering the welfare of children. Halm was arrested in Ontario, in 1993, and ordered deported.

In 1995, Justice Reed revoked the deportation order because, in her opinion, deportation would violate Halm's right to the security of a person as guaranteed in the Charter of Rights. Justice Reed further identified that the Canadian Law, stipulating a special age requirement for anal penetration, was invalid because it violated Section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights which guarantees equity before the law.

It was Justice Reed's opinion that, 'It is not justifiable to make an activity criminal, even if the majority of the citizenry should consider it to be immoral.'

BACK TO TOP

LAWYERS SPEAK OUT

EISBRENNER, Karl - November 22, 2003

This 'email' is posted with permission from the writer as is identified in the first line of the text. Mr. Eisbrenner is a lawyer from British Columbia who, at the time of this posting, is arguing against his suspension from the bar.

From: karl-heintz eisbrenner Save Address Print View Hide Headers Show as Text Report Junk Mail Block Sender Block Sender's Domain Date: 22 Nov 12:51 (PST) To: rwnicholson@canada.com Cc: themail@newyorker.com, insidercrew@rock104.com, dcayo@png.canwest.com, cartenjohn@hotmail.com Subject: eisbrenner Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-503405658-1069534318=:29692" Message-Id: <20031122205158.30045.qmail@web20513.mail.yahoo.com> X-Received: 22 Nov 2003 21:24:17 GMT Return-Path: Received: (cpmta 14849 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2003 13:24:17 -0800 Received: from 216.136.174.44 (HELO web20513.mail.yahoo.com) by smtp.c009.snv.cp.net (209.228.34.109) with SMTP; 22 Nov 2003 13:24:17 -0800 Received: from [66.183.220.191] by web20513.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:51:58 PST MIME-Version: 1.0

rob,
you have my permission to post information regarding my suspension on Nov. 29.02 by the law society of b.c. the court of appeal granted me orders on sept. 13.02 allowing me to continue with an appeal against the Ministry of Energy Mines and Petroleum Resources [represented by Lisa Mrozinski, of the Attorney General's "Legal Services Branch" those orders included allowing me to continue a May 4.01 Notice of Motion asking the court to strike the reasons for judgment of Drossos J. [now retired] as vexatious, scandalous and embarrassing the reasons are based on Drossos J. rewriting my indictment implicating Premier Gordon Campbell and 2 cabinet ministers, Rick Thorpe and Bill Barisoff in fraud, breach of trust and obstruction of justice on Sept. 11.98 Barisoffs commercial sand and gravel company started mining without a permit next door to hundreds of elderly residents T. Richard Brooke, Q.C. [now Mr Justice Brooke] gave legal advice to the elderly and their landlords in Sept. 98 telling them he and his 'client' the Regional District would 'take care of things' he did by giving [then investigative reporter] Gary Symons of the Penticton Herald false and fabricated evidence and information alleging Barisoffs were mining commercially and legally, when his own law firm's documents [he was senior partner] showed there was no basis for saying so Gary Symons published an article in the Penticton Herald based on Mr Brooke's 'fabrications'; Brooke admitted to me Barisoffs did fabricate evidence [at his request on Oct. 7.99] but was elevated to the b.c. supreme court bench before I could get his affidavit Brooke filed admissions in b.c. provincial court on Mar. 16.99 admitting the Regional District of Okanagan Similkameen violated the law and participated with MLA's Campbell, Thorpe and Barisoff, in covering up evidence and suppressing false affidavits filed in b.c. supreme court proceedings [No. 00632, Oliver Registry, in Brouwer/Kuiper et al v. the government [Mines Ministry, Regional District, Barisoff MLA, his family, and family company] the law society of b.c. took offence at my Feb. 12.99 pleadings filed in b.c. supreme court, alleged they were improper because they and my June 28.00 submission filed in court implicated the b.c. supreme court in crimes unless the court granted what my clients [the elderly/their landlords] were entitled to Justice Drossos rewrote my indictment, an offence under the Legal Profession Act; he admitted it on the record in b.c. supreme court on July 3.01 Master Bishop covered up Mr Brooke's admissions that his client, the District, participated in fraud, coverup and suppression of truth Justice Davies covered up the District's [good old boy] fraud involving a) government money for a fish ladder for fall spawning salmon in a creek that is dry, b) government money for road contracts for the Osoyoos Indian Band casino, c) Barisoffs mining without a permit [an offence carrying up to 1 year jail term and up to $ 100,000 fine for those who do it and for those who aid or abet it] the b.c. supreme court, according to Bencher G. Jack Harris, Q.C. did not want the facts of the Brouwer/Kuiper case made public in 2000 for fear it would impact on the provincial election scheduled the next spring apparently some of the power brokers, back room boys, did not want anyone or anything to interfere with their boy, Gordo, being elected [after failing in 1996] bottom line: prior to b.c.'s May 2001 election, evidence shows the b.c. supreme court via certain of its 'federally appointed' members suppressed evidence of government fraud, breach of trust, obstruction of justice, i.e. leaving open the real question whether the last election was 'rigged' by members of the judiciary the case pleadings set a precedent allowing groups of people harmed or abused by government to a) file for class certification under the Class Proceeding Act, b) in the same petition that asks for a Court to review and set aside government decisions, policies and operations that are abusive or harmful to the people, and c) using Rule 31 of the B.C. Supreme Court rules, to force government to admit facts and to disclose documents without having to go through 'freedom of information' delays most class actions are started by a writ/statement of claim and seek money damages, but this procedure leaves governments free to abuse others a judicial review application must be by petition, it gives the court jurisdiction to set aside government decisions, prohibit government decisions or force governments to make decisions and release people from abusive government 'laws' i combined the two procedures in one petition, something the b.c. supreme court had not seen before, and something the court and the government lawyers could not defend against i am happy to elaborate on any details so any group of people in the province can use the courts to force the elected ones, the elite, to be accountable for their promises and to force government bureaucrats to be responsible for their actions. the pleadings do not allow the abusers to hide behind 'laws' or beliefs they can do what is unethical but excuse the conduct as still 'legal'

thanks rob, for sharing this information
karl-heintz eisbrenner

EISBRENNER, Karl - November 26, 2003

 Posted with permission from Mr. Eisbrenner

From: karl-heintz eisbrenner Save Address Print View Hide Headers Show as Text Report Junk Mail Block Sender Block Sender's Domain Date: 26 Nov 11:34 (PST) To: rwnicholson@canada.com, cartenjohn@hotmail.com, idslayer@telus.net Cc: insidercrew@rock104.com, themail@newyorker.com Subject: IF YOU ARE IN BFED UP WITH THE 'INJUSTICE SYSTEM'? THIS IS FOR YOU! Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-615821990-1069875254=:2501" Message-Id: <20031126193414.2530.qmail@web20508.mail.yahoo.com> X-Received: 26 Nov 2003 19:34:03 GMT Return-Path: Received: (cpmta 21651 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2003 11:34:03 -0800 Received: from 216.136.226.143 (HELO web20508.mail.yahoo.com) by smtp.c009.snv.cp.net (209.228.34.110) with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 11:34:03 -0800 Received: from [24.69.255.205] by web20508.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 11:34:14 PST MIME-Version: 1.0

good news!

in all of the united kingdom there are less than 1000 'barristers' i.e. courtroom lawyers for over 60,000,000 people in all of british columbia there are more than 9000 'barristers and solicitors' for under 5,000,000 people

what are 'lawyers' in british columbia, really?

a) a person who qualifies to be called a 'lawyer' in b.c. is also automatically an 'officer' of the b.c. supreme court [a federal government body] b) a person who qualifies to 'practice law' in b.c. belongs to what the law society calls 'a legal money making monopoly' c) a 'lawyer' according to former b.c. law society president Richard Margetts, Q.C., is in the business of 'selling knowledge of law for money' d) Richard Gibbs, Q.C., another president of the same society on Dec. 5.02 signed a contract with other canadian law societies to form a 'federation' so that any lawyer from b.c. who has a 'discipline record' cannot be a 'lawyer' or 'practice law' anywhere in any other province who signed that contract e) professor Donovan Waters, Q.C. of the University of Victoria says the profession of law has deteriorated into merely 'a business' f) lawyers in b.c. can charge g.s.t. [goods and services tax] on fees they charge to clients g) the b.c. code of professional conduct says 'lawyer' and 'law practice' ..." is not a ... money making business' h) lawyers in b.c. who belong to the 'legal monopoly' can charge people money for 'legal advice', making the advice a commodity, product, a 'service' that attracts 7% tax i) the law society of b.c. and the attorney general of b.c. have a sweet deal that gives 'lawyers' in b.c. a monopoly on helping out people who have legal problems with the government, i.e. section 4 of the B.C. Attorney General Act and section 15(3) of the Legal Profession Act, give b.c. 'lawyers' exclusive power, authority and jurisdiction to 'practice law' and to prosecute any one else under those sections, charging them with the offence of 'unauthorized practice of law' j) in b.c. the 'practice of law' is equivalent to 'trade and commerce', not 'the administration of justice'

lawyers in b.c., are not engaged in 'the administration of justice', lawyers in b.c. are 'federal government officers' with loyalty to the 'federal government' and its politically appointed superior court judges, lawyers in b.c. are participants in a profit making merchandising scheme that is only protected by a few words on a piece of paper, words that say the law sociey of b.c. is a protected 'species', protected by the attorney general of b.c. and the law society who hide behind sections 15(3) and section 4, but those words are not written in stone, those words can be erased, those words can be changed so that the law society and attorney general can be held liable, accountable and responsible for abusing the people, only those few words allow the law society and the attorney general of b.c. to interfere with your right to help others fight ICBC, WCB, and all the other 'bureaucracies"... successfully

NOTICE:

IF YOU OR ANYONE YOU KNOW HAS BEEN PERSECUTED OR PROSECUTED BY THE LAW SOCIETY FOR 'UNAUTHORIZED PRACTICE OF LAW', THERE IS SOMETHING VERY SIMPLE YOU CAN DO TO GET BACK YOUR FREEDOM, YOUR AUTONOMY AND YOUR RIGHT TO HELP YOUR NEIGHBOUR, YOU CAN STOP THE SOCIETY IN ITS TRACKS, YOU CAN FORCE THE SOCIETY TO PAY COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE SOCIETY'S ABUSE OF THE PEOPLE IT IS SUPPOSED TO SERVE, AND YOU CAN FINALLY DO WHAT SHAKESPEARE SAID IN THE 1500'S: "FIRST, KILL ALL THE LAWYERS".

I CAN HELP.

karl-heintz eisbrenner - eisbrennerlaw@yahoo.com

BACK TO TOP